Stenciling Dissent
Political graffiti engages students in the history of protest for social justice
Andrew Reed
Preface: instead of a regular summary, I decided to "teach" about this chapter using digestable answers to basic questions about the chapter.
Who?
Andrew Reed and his students in his U.S history classes in an urban school in Wichita, Kansas. Many students of his are immigrants (either first or second generation*) and from lower socioeconomic households.
What?
Reed decided to create a stencil project-- a project where students would engage in research and use technology to create stencils to support their learning of an important person or group that was responsible for an important protest in the United States.
What does Reed believe?
Reed believes that history is a vehicle to learn what you're capable of-- that students can use their knowledge of history and of protest to internalized the importance of protest in United States history, especially the United States history of minorities. Reed believes art is an effective way means to reach out to other people-- especially public art. Reed believes his teaching should be culturally responsive and engaging-- that it should relate to his students and believes in teaching a wider view of United States history, more than the white-man's take on things.
Why protest?
Reed understood and taught that protest served as a way to speak for those who couldn't "...dissent, strikes and protest have given the poor, minorities, and immigrants a voice when the vote hasn't". He recalled a time in 2006 when his students learned about a Chicano protests. His students learned that their voice matters, that protest does something and led a walkout to support immigrant rights rallies !!-- around 500 people joined from different Wichita schools.
Why stencils?
Stencils are often used as a form of street protest throughout the world because "they're easy to make, quick to apply, and can be used over and over again."
What did students do with the stencils?
Reed bought a piece of canvas to use as a wall, students then spray painted their stencils onto the "wall." Later, Reed displayed the "wall" on a prominent wall in the school. Students also worked on a paragraph to be displayed near their stencil that detailed the most important details about their person or group. Having to take weeks of research and form one 5-6 sentence paragraph proved difficult for students but also meant students had to hone in on the most important parts of their research.
What were reactions to the "wall"?
A lot of students engaged positively to it, going up to the wall, seeing graffiti figures and paragraphs of the impact and importance that these figures and groups had.
Not all reactions were positive, some people came up to Reed and let him know that he was missing certain figures or groups-- but Reed poses this as a positive, the wall was making people think critically: "Who else should be up there? Who else have I learned about whose protest was important to U.S history?"
There were also (as can be expected) some negative reactions to the wall-- a staff member told Reed he wanted to get paint from his house and paint over the whole thing, some other staff members declared it was Anti-American. Some staff members also had strong feelings about graffiti being present-- due to their preconceived notions of street art being gang related.
Final take away-- quote:
"Especially in an urban school where students appreciate graffiti and other street art, stencils hold the potential to engage students. Youth can create something that might get them in trouble on the streets but an A in the classroom. And students can use stencils in other ways; to create their own shirts, posters, book covers, or postcards. Whether in a school or on the streets, stencils-- at least political ones-- can catch onlookers' attention and make them think."
* second generation immigrants refers to the child or children of immigrants